This year, I began to leave video feedback using Explain Everything or Screen-cast-o-matic during second quarter. I had one student say he really liked the video feedback. "It's like you're right here talking to me." I had another that, when it came time to give himself a grade, didn't know what he has earned because he "never looked at the links" (to the feedback).
I checked one of my videos this morning, and I saw that students had not watched the video feedback I diligently left for them. I came up with this conclusion: I need to provide time IN CLASS for students to watch the video feedback I've given. Here is my proof - NO VIEWS on 80% of this sampling:
Which made me pretty upset. Just ask my husband, who had to spend an hour in the car with me after I noticed these stats.
I've taken the time to create the feedback and upload it. The time it takes to give the feedback is actually the same as the "old" way - leaving a positive comment and a revision suggestion on Google docs or even on paper takes 5 minutes. It's the uploading that makes video feedback take twice the time on my end. And then copying that darn link and pasting it on the student's document, my master document, and in the online gradebook = more time than I've taken previously.
And then I got to thinking some more...
- If students don't look at the video links I leave for them, do these same students ever look at the Google Doc comments I leave for them?
- The ones that had been viewed multiple times have been REVISED multiple times (which is the goal).
- I'm a fake. I say my last class is grading themselves... I lied!
I need to stop here and explain. I figured something out. I figured out something that Mark Barnes in Assessment 3.0 had already told me last year.
** I cannot leave ANY type of "final" "grade" on any assignment I expect them to revise. **
Here's what I do lately...
- Give feedback on an assignment (video, on a Google Doc, or even in person) - what the student did well, and suggestions for the student to work on / revise.
- Highlight on the rubric where the student's assignment currently resides ("needs improvement," "developing," "proficient," "mastery").
- In the box for the grade online, I have been putting the link to the video feedback, or simply copying / pasting the typed comment.
- ALSO in this box for the grade online, I have been putting the rubric feedback (ex: "Developing: Describes some explicit or inferential parts of evidence, but not both. I have to make some jumps to follow your reasoning.").
That's my problem!!
Students are seeing a "grade" of sorts online and on the rubrics! Why look at the feedback, then? Why do I expect they'll WANT to revise?! As Hubby says, "Revising is hard!" DUH! Every year we have students who revise because they're grade-driven, and then we've got students who really don't care about the grade or doing the work, so they don't revise. What makes me think that would change?! I haven't been able to change their mindsets about grades (yet), and I've been blinded by my own visions.
In order for students and I to truly shift our thinking to "It's not about the grade; it's about the learning," I need to only give them information on what they did WELL, and suggestions for improvement. NO "needs improvement," "developing," "proficient" or "mastery." (Well... maybe I can leave "mastery" on work that is at that level!)
Here is what I NEED to do...
- Include in our curriculum articles about grading and mindset at the beginning of the year. Really set it up and have students discuss and reflect.
- In each assignment, give students a summary of what they did WELL. What did I notice?
- In each assignment, give suggestions for improvement (biggest impact stressed; minor suggestions can wait).
- Change the feedback loop I created in December. I realize now that that loop was another STEP in the right direction, but still not focusing on learning, learning, learning.
- Write grade-related information (NI, D, P, M) in my paper gradebook in case the student is not mature enough to grade him/herself at the end of the quarter, or in case we need "numbers" of some sort for problem solving or benchmarks.
- Ask students to revise all work and turn it back in for more feedback.
- Leave the summary and suggestions for improvement on the online program that kids and parents see (whether this is video feedback or written).
- Make sure students know they can come to me at any time to assess together how they think they're progressing.
- Give time in class for students to watch / read / listen to feedback.
- Give time in class for students to revise and resubmit.
- Ask students to reflect on what they learned from assignments - about themselves, their habits, their beliefs, or their learning. (How often would this be needed?)
- Continually ask --> "What did you learn...?"
- Leave a week (3-5 days?) at the end of the quarter for one-on-one conversations with students about their grades (since they will virtually have NONE).
- Plan for another activity to take place during that week (one idea is to move Genius Hour to one week at the end of each quarter, another is a reading or writing project of choice).
Here's what I still WANT to do...
- Make every "assignment" relevant to the world - something students can put on their blogs for the world to see.
- Give feedback in chunks - which means not one assignment coming in to me from all students at the same time. A year-long project would be great for this. Again... another idea from Mark Barnes in ROLE Reversal...
- Have students truly grade themselves (since a final grade is still expected).
- Get my coworkers on board.
Teaching is tough. I just want to know what to do and how to do it right. And yet the challenge is what keeps me coming back for more. I've jumped in to this glorious mess. I am still learning.
My resources so far: "FaR" tabs of our classroom Weebly
Feedback Instead of Grades LiveBinder for parents to inspect
My own reflections on this journey
