Luddism,
a protest movement that arose from the textile trade in Britain 200 years ago,
first emerged during 1811, in the Midlands, as a reaction to the replacement of
skilled craftsmen with new labour-saving technology. A pattern of public petitioning
quickly emerged, which was followed by machine breaking and violence across
Britain’s main textile areas…
Richard
Jones, a research student in economic and financial history at the University
of Cambridge, says: “The Word Luddite has now entered everyday usage to
describe those who dislike technology, oppose innovation or who are generally
resistant to change…”
I read this, and I knew I was a Luddite not long ago. I
remember when our new principal at the beginning of the 2011-2012 school year,
asked us about BYOT, I was not excited. I just KNEW the kids would be texting
each other, cheating by looking things up, and playing games.
Then I was the chosen one in the district to pilot the iPad
writing program for four weeks. The white hairs came with this pilot, but I
completed it the way I was asked. In this time, I noticed that my one student
who is always playing with a pencil or a toy was now playing with the iPad –
moving apps around! As our class had discussions, he busied himself moving the apps
around. I saw it, and I thought – Doodler. That’s okay. I can handle doodling.
It helps the brain think! (See this TED Talk about doodlers – you’ll be passing
out paper and pencils! Doodlers Unite www.ted.com/talks/sunni_brown.html ) But
students having their phones in class? For what purpose? Google? Not good
enough for me.
Then I read the next line…
(More
from Richard Jones…) “In my opinion, however, this is a misreading of the
original Luddite motivation… Luddites were motivated by a desire to protect the
status quo of their established skilled trades and their positions within those
trades… When machinery displaced them, they naturally reacted very strongly.”
Well, then. I was NOT a Luddite, after all… right? I KNEW
that technology would not displace me. I had tenure! I was set! I was in like
Flynn! I could pass it all up and still teach. No issues. I would not protest
the BYOT, I just wouldn’t buy into it.
But then I thought… If I were an administrator, I would not
be looking for new teachers that didn’t know how to use technology. And the
more I learned from my PLN on Twitter, the more I knew I would be changing the
way I taught sooner, rather than later. And you know what else? Go ahead and
let students search Google on their phones. What will they find? Not the
answers to my tests. No. My tests (what tests??) were not going to have answers
on it you COULD Google. They would feature critical thinking. They would have
students applying what they knew, not just giving the ages of Ponyboy’s brothers.
(Oh, I always despised that question!!)
I was in on the hiring process this June, for we were
seeking two new LA/LIT positions at our middle school. I was not looking for
the teacher who had students in silent lines in the hallways, sitting in rows
facing front, memorizing the school rules. I was looking for someone who could
engage students as readers and writers. Technology or not, I was not looking
for the “old-school” version of a school teacher.
Hodgman also states (p79),
The
Luddites were always destined to fail.
I think Luddites may be destined to fail, but I think what’s
most important is that we’ll fail students if we do not change with the times,
and grab hold of what we can to enhance student learning. Technology will
continue to grow leaps and bounds, just as it’s done in the past. I need to use
the technology to help my students develop their creativity, their critical
thinking, their collaboration…
Here’s someone I’ve quoted many times, C.F. Kettering…
Nothing is constant but change.
Let’s be positive role models, and teach our students that
we can change along with the times. Let’s help them with the technology as
well. Knowing full well they’ll have digital footprint, let’s help them make it
a positive one.
Nice post Joy. I especially liked your point about failing our students if we do not change with the times. We need to be more relevant and use the tools that they use to learn.
ReplyDeleteAnother relevant post by you, Joy. Well-written and so true...if we fail students by not changing then we're not doing our jobs and just like in business - should be booted out the door. For so long it appeared that teachers were exempt from being fired, but it's a little better in Iowa than it was. I can't stand inadequacy and then complaining because the administrators have been in your classroom a lot lately. Anyway, on a positive note, it's so refreshing to be connected to enthusiastic teachers who want to do what's best for kids.
ReplyDeleteJoy, I love the line, "If I were an administrator, I would not be looking for new teachers that didn’t know how to use technology." I wonderful point, and something the technology-resistant need to take note of.
ReplyDeleteIf you wouldn't hire a new teacher who didn't trust his or her students with tech, then for how much longer can that possibly be an acceptable position for established teachers to hold? Not much longer, I hope!
Joy,
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. Besides what others have noted here, I also like how you bring it to a most important point: "Knowing full well they’ll have digital footprint, let’s help them make it a positive one."
Another fabulous blog post, Joy :)
ReplyDeleteI love reading your blog and always learn something new (in fact, while reading this I had to open two more tabs on my computer for further reading afterwards)!
~Gallit
Oh, Joy, what a joy you are! I love the personality and thinking that comes out in your blog posts. My favorite:
ReplyDelete"And you know what else? Go ahead and let students search Google on their phones. What will they find? Not the answers to my tests. No. My tests (what tests??) were not going to have answers on it you COULD Google." PRICELESS!
Thanks for sharing! I do not want to be a Luddite!
Denise
P.S. Thank your husband for us!